TIME PROBLEM

    We can ask not only what exists, why is there that exists, but how they exist. From the latter perspective, we refer to the existence of size and features, such as space, time, order, determination.
     Space and time were considered fundamental determinations, ways of being, in general, and of every thing. About anything can truly say it exists only to the extent that occupies a space in a particular time.
     In a broad sense, space is understood through the categories coexistence (left - front right - back, top - bottom), and during the sequence categories (before - after) or duration (more - less). Space is a chain of "places" and during a succession of moments.
     With reference to space and time, we can talk about a more important problem-type, and that is: If
a) objective (independent of our experience, our way of perceiving reality)
b) subjective (single perspectives or ways of understanding human existence)
     The distinction between objective and subjective time is intuitive.
Ex: For a person who says an examination time can run faster, but the same person may believe that time can run hard when someone is waiting.
     It is even possible that the flow of time in similar situations to be lived differently by different people.
Ex: A person who has learned for the exam may feel that time passes slowly, but for someone who has taught at the same time and it will seem that it was much harder.   
     On the other hand, the perception of time talking about living or implicitly assumes the existence objectively. The problem is not so if time exists, but whether we can ever know what time itself, independent of our way of living or our knowledge.
     Moments of time - past, present and future - so-called arrow indicates the time: it flows in one direction, irreversibly, from past to viitor.Oamenii have always been fascinated by the idea of cyclical return of all things or the possibility of time travel.
     Talking about an arrow of time, scientists and philosophers concerned with this issue, especially spotlighted character irreversibility of time, demon ¬ strabil with different arguments. Unidimensionalităţii most general aspect is the transition from the past through the present into the future, we can discuss the unidimensionalităţii unique flow and sense of time, so imposible ¬ bility to achieve the road opposite.
     The main argument in this case is the causal chains, unable occur before the cause and effect, most often causal relations note sequence, the effect of continuing to exist and to act as stop the cause, but obviously as a result of its action.
     Gradually the outlines for the twentieth century, more in ¬ not consistently, diversified approach to quality time. Spe ¬ cificitatea temporal coordinate forces to distinguish between cosmic time (astronomy), physical time, the biolo ¬ GIC, human (individual and social).
     The biologic, widely researched, although still in an incipient form, put the first issue of differences between physical time (chronologically) and biologically, so that biological time can not always be measured in physical time units. This can be illustrated with different rates of maturation and aging of various organisms. But highlighting the different dead ¬ rite, one can say that time is dilated young body than the old body, whereas the second life of a young body is rich in physiological processes. For a child, so the day is longer than the mature man, because they occur in much more events and be ¬ ziologic plan and psychically, so the activity is more intense.
     Plato says that before the birth of the sky, there were days and nights, months and years, and the Demiurge (the name given to the philosophy of Plato, who forged the world divine creator, the creator of the universe, ie God), so did they appear with the composition of the universe.
     All these are part of the time and both "was" and "will" are forms born of time which, Plato says, they wrongly attributes of eternal existence. For we say "was" is "and"will "but only" is "fits a real speech, while " was "and"will "refers to making that takes place in time because they are movements, while what is always the same and no building can not become older or younger with time, and never once was, is not now, nor will it ever be in the making.
     When asked what is time? St. Augustine says, even if time is both familiar and unknown, who could easily and briefly explain this? We understand what he is talking about when we hear about it, but St. Augustine says that if nobody asks, you know, and if he wants to explain to someone who asks, do not know. So our mind is the time to understand as to explain in words but is much more difficult.
     But St. Augustine says that he can assert with confidence that it would not pass anything if there would be long gone and would not come if something is not for the future and if there would be nothing, would not be long now.
     And "This, however, if it ever present in the past and would not pass, there would be time but eternity. "